Welcome to your Recent Case Laws 2
11. Deity may be a juristic person for purpose of religious laws and capable of asserting property rights. However, deity is not a 'person' for the purpose of Part III of the Constitution. Supreme Court observed this in which of the following case?
12. In which case Supreme Court upheld the validity of National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admissions to medical and dental courses?
13. In which case Supreme Court held that Writ under Article 32 not maintainable for enforcement of personal contractual rights.
14. In which case Supreme Court held that Speaker of the Legislative Assembly should decided on a petition seeking disqualification of a member under Tenth Schedule of the Constitution within a period of three months , in the absence of exceptional reasons?
15. In which case Supreme Court held that the Speaker does not have any explicit power to specify the period of disqualification under the Tenth Schedule or bar a Member from contesting elections after disqualification until the end of the term of the Legislative Assembly ?
16. In which case Supreme Court while hearing the Sabarimala reference has held that the Supreme Court can refer questions of law to a larger bench while exercising its review jurisdiction?
17. In which case Supreme Court held that Civil judges are not eligible to seek direct recruitment to post of District Judges in bar quota?
18. In which case Supreme Court held that condemnation of delay is a matter of judicial discretion, which must be exercised judiciously. There is no period of limitation prescribed for the courts to exercise their constitutional jurisdiction to do substantial justice.
19. The concept of 'justice' equity and good conscience' as a tool to ensure a just outcome also finds expression in Article 142 of the Constitution. The phrase 'is necessary for doing complete justice' is of wide amplitude and encompasses a power of equity which is employed when the strict application of law is inadequate to produce just outcome. Supreme Court observed this in which of the following case?
20. In which case Supreme Court held that the principle that the High Court should not exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction when an efficacious alternative remedy is available, is a rule of prudence and not a rule of law?
