Labour Law

Welcome to your Labour Law

1. 
In which case the Supreme Court declared that an educational institution is 'industry' :

2. 
In which one of the following cases, the Supreme Court had held 'Bandh' to be unconstitutional :

3. 
In which of the following case the Supreme Court recognised the theory of "Hire and Fire" in labour law ?

4. 
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that " the members of non-recognised union cannot be represented in collective bargaining proceedings or individual grievanves of its members ".

5. 
In which of the following cases it is well established that, any settlement between the employer and with one or more concerned union in a concilliation proceeding would bind all other workmen unions who were not made parties to the settlement :

6. 
In view of the change in economic policy of the country it might not now be proper to allow the employees to break the discipline. the Supreme Court held so in :

7. 
Which of the following is not a leading case on immunity of trade unions from criminal proceedings ?

8. 
Which of the following pairs are not matched ?

9. 
In which of the following cases the GHERAO was declared were rendered is Codes :

10. 
Which of the following cases is related to unfair labour practices ?

11. 
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that medical representative is not workman ?

12. 
In which of the following cases the Court reiterated the well-known legal position that even a temporary worker can claim retrenchment compensation, if he is covered by the provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

13. 
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that "the benefit of running allowance had to be taken into consideration for computing pension only once, at the time of retirement of the employee, not for any future calculation"?

14. 
A seven Judges Bench of the Supreme Court considered the scope of Industry and laid down a Triple Test Formula in one of the following cases :

15. 
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that "there was no rule of thumb that in every case of termination of workman's service in violation of Section 25F of ID Act relief of re-instatement should be granted ?"

16. 
In order to entitle the workmen to wages for the period of strike, the strike should be legal as well as justified. The above principle was laid down in one of the following case by apex court :

17. 
In one of the following case the Supreme Court held that when retrenchment of a workmen is invalid reinstatement can be ordered :

18. 
"The right to strike may be controlled or restricted by appropriate industrial legislation and the validity of such legislation would have to be tested not with reference to the criteria laid down in clause (4) of Article 19 but by totally different considerations" , was observed by the Supreme Court in :

19. 
The Supreme Court referred the ILO instruments to reiterate the workers participation in the industrial process as enshrined in the constitution and other labour legislations in one of the following case :

20. 
"A strike could be legal or illegal and an illegal strike could be a justified one" was opined by Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer in one of the following case :

21. 
"To deter reckless, unjust, unfair or mala fide closure, the requirement of a prior permission for closure by itself cannot be unreasonable restriction on the fundamental right of an employer" was observed in one of the following case :

22. 
In which case did the Supreme Court place the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa before the Chief Justice of India for reconsideration by a larger bench ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *