IPC 6 – Offences against Human Body

The case of K.M. Nanawati v. State of Maharashtra is related to :-

Decision in which one of the following cases has been described by the Supreme court to have attained the status of a landmark for bringing out correct tests for application of Section 300(3) of the IPC ?

In Rex v. Govinda the points of distinction between the provisions of the following sections of the IPC were explained :-

The distinction between section 299 and section 300 of IPC, 1860 was first elaborately discussed in the following case :-

Which of the following cases is considered as locus classicus on Section 300 thirdly of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ?

In which of the following leading cases, Justice Vivian Bose distinguished culpable homicide and murder ?

State of A.P. v. R. Punnayya case deals with distinction between which of following sections of indian Penal Code ?

Under which one of the following cases, the Supreme court of India, has reaffirmed the distinction between culpable homicide and murder whiling adopting the view suggested in Govind case :

The case of Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab is related to -

Every doctor is not responsible under Section 304 (A) of the Indian Penal Code 1860 for death of a person due to his negligent operation unless his intension is culpable. This has been laid down in