IPC 3 – Common Intention & Common Object

Which one of the following cases is a case relating to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ?

In which of the following cases the Privy Council made a distinction between 'common intension' and 'similar intention'?

In which one of the following cases Lord Summer said, "they also serve who stand and wait"?

Distinction between Sections 34 and 149 of IPC has been authoritatively expounded by the Supreme Court in

Which one of the following cases is not related to principle of joint liability based on common intention ?

In which of the following cases a clear difference between common intension and similar intention was well discussed ?

The principle of distinction between similar intention and same intention was laid down in :

Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor is a leading case on which of the following subjects :

The case of Mahboob Shah v. Emperor was decided by which one of the following Courts ?

The judgment in case of Mahboob Shah v. Emperor was given by which one of the following judges ?

The difference between Section 34 and 149 IPC has been brought out in which one of the following important cases by the Supreme Court ?

Which one of the following case is related to "joint liability" under Indian Penal Code ?

The 'doctrine of joint liability' as envisaged by Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is based on the decision of the following -

Adistinction has been well explained by the Supreme Court in Nanakchand v. State of Punjab (A.I.R. 1955 SC 274) relating to which one of the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code ?