CrPC 6 – Charge / General Provision of Inquiry & Trail

1.The principle that accused cannot at the stage of framing charge invoke Section 91 was laid down in -

2.In which case, it was held that at the time of framing charge or taking cognizance, accused has no right to produce any material?

3. In a case the Supreme Court observed thus - "we are unable to find any magic or charm in the ritual of a charge. It is the substance of these provisions (relating to charge ) that count and not their outform. To hold otherwise is only to provide avenues or escape for the guilty and afford no protection to the innocent ." The court made these observations in relation to

4. In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that at the stage of framing of charge materials and document filed by the accused cannot be considered. Material produced by the prosecution alone is to be considered . Depriving the accused of the opportunity is not violative of Articles 20 and 14 of the Constitution?

5. "If an accused is charged of a major offence but is not found guilty thereunder, he can be convicted of minor offence , if the facts established indicate that such minor offence has been committed ." It was upheld in which case

6.In which case did a Five Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court consider the ambit and scope of Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ?

7. Constitution Bench of Supreme Court in judgment "Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab ", decided on 10.01.2014 settled controversy regarding law containing in Section ........................ of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 :

8. Which case is related of the power of the court to examine the accused ?

9. In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that erring Prosecution and Investigating Officers must be proceeded against in case of unmerited acquittals and wrongful convictions?

10. In which case Supreme court held that the provisions of Section 300 CrPC are based on the principle of res judicata or issue estoppels ?