Welcome to your C 8 - Legislature
Keshav Singh's case is related to :-
Which of the following cases is in connection with parliamentary privileges ?
The Supreme Court observed that, Parliamentary Privileges are not subject to Fundamental Rights in
The Supreme Court observed that "Parliamentary proceedings are not subject to Fundamental Rights" in the following case :
Which of the following cases is not related to the Parliamentary privileges ?
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that any member of Parliament, Member of Legislative Assembly or Member of Legisletive Council who is convicted of a crime and given a minimum of two years imprisionment losses membership of the House with immediate effect?
In which of the following cases has the Supreme Court made it mandatory for candidates contesting elections to the legislatures and their spouses to declare their source of income at the time of filling nominations ?
In Raja Ram Pal v. Hon'ble Speaker, Loksabha and Others (2007), which one of the following was not an issue before the Supreme Court .
Any Member of Parliament (MP), Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) or Member of a Legislative Council (MLC) who is convicted of a crime with more than two year sentences, will be disqualified as an elected representative on the date of conviction. In which of the following verdict, the Supreme Court opined so which sent waves of panic amongst the government
In which case, the Supreme Court for the first time laid down two elements, viz. the connection must be real and not illusory and the liability sought to be imposed must be pertinent to that connection, with regard to territorial nexus ?
In Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar, the State made a law under Entry 54, List II and Center made a law under entry 33 of List III . The laws overlaps. Will repugnancy arise in such a case ?
Which of the following cases is known as 'cash for query' case ?
The doctrine of "occupied field" was applied by the Supreme Court in the case of :
The case of Markandey Katju v. Lok Sabha, (2017) 2 SCC 384 is related to :
M.S.M. Sharma v. Shri Krishna Sinha, AIR 1959 SC 395, is primarily case on
In which the Supreme Court has held that Parliament has power to make law in respect of any matter excluded from the Union List if the same is not included in the State List ?
The case of State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh is related with which of the following doctrines ?
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that any Members of Parliament, Member of Legislative Assembly or Member of Legislative Council who is Convicted of a crime and given a minimum of two years imprisonment loses membership of the House with immediate effect ?
M.S.M. Sharma v. Shri Krishna Sinha, AIR 1959 SC 395, is primarily case on
In which the Supreme Court has held that Parliament has power to make law in respect of any matter excluded from the Union List if the same is not included in the State List ?
The case of State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh is related with which of the following doctrines ?
