C 4 – FR 10 – Right to Constitutional Remedies

Welcome to your C 4 - FR 10 - Right to Constitutional Remedies

Which of the following cases was the first case where the strict adherence to the rules of Locus Standi was diluted ?

In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court rule that the principle of sovereign immunity will not apply to a proceeding for award of compensation for violation of fundamental rights ?

In which of the following case compensation was first time awarded for violation of Fundamental Rights ?

The case in which the Supreme Court has issued a writ of continuing mandamus is :-

The Fundamental Right to move the Supreme Court has been described as the cornerstone of the democratic edifice raised by the Constitution and as such the Supreme Court must always regard it as its solemn duty to protect the said Fundamental rights zealously and vigilantly. This has been stated by the Supreme Court in :

A suit lies against the Government for death or injury caused to a person by police atrocities as held in ...

In which of the following judgment, the scope of the writ of Habeas Corpus was widened ?

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court refused to give any relief to the petitioner(s) under Article 32 ?

In which one of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that the Government Employees can also file Public Interest Litigatioin since the Right to Judicial Remedies is a Constitutional Right available to all citizens of India ?

'No PIL under Article 32 will be entertained concerning inter-State river waters' was said by the Supreme Court in :

Rudul Shah v. State of Bihar, (1983) is known for

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India has held that "public interest prevails over private interest "?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *