The case of R.v. Dudley and Stephen is related to the defence of :
The leading case on Section 83 of I.P.C is :
McNaughten case is related to which of the following section of the IPC ?
Which of the following case lays down the principlesrelating to the defence of unsoundness of mind?
"Expression 'unsoundness of mind' has not been defined in Indian Penal Code and has mainly been treated as equivalent to insanity. An accused who seeks exoneration from liability of any act under Section 84 of IPC is to prove legal insanity and not medical insanity." It was held by the Supreme Court in Following case :
The case of Durhum v. United States is related to
Which of the following is a leading case on intoxication ?
In which of the following 'Wild Beast Test' was propounded?
Which one of the following cases does not relate to intoxication?
In Basudeo v. State of Pepsu the Supreme Court has explained the true scope of the following section of the Indian Penal Code :
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has observed that there is no right of private defence against the right of private defence?
"The right of private defence of body commences as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises and continues as long as such apprehension continues." This observation was made by the Supreme Court in :
The right granted under Section 100 of the IPC to the extent of causing death can be exercised against an assault which reasonably causes an apprehension that death will otherwise be the consequences of the assault. The above rule has been explained by the Supreme Court in which of the famous case
The Supreme Court recognized the principles of "Ignorance of law is not an excuse" in the case of :
Which of the following pair is not correctly matched?
Director Public Prosecution v. Beard is a leading case on which one of the following?
In which case it has been held that in determining whether the force employed in the exercise of right of private defence was actually necessary or not, it is unreasonable to weight the facts of a case on golden scales?
