IEA 2 – Admission & Confession

The case of Kashmira Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh relates to :

The constitutionality of which Section of the Indian Evidence Act was callenged in "State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyay" for the violation of Article 14 of the Constitution ?

In which of the following judgement Supreme Court ruled that Section 27 is an exeception to Section 25 and 26 of Evidence Act ?

"The statement in order to constitute a 'confession' under the Indian Evidence Act, must either admit in terms of the offence or at any rate substantially all facts which constitute the offence." The above view was expressed by the Privy Council in which one of the following cases ?

Palvinder Kaur v. State of Punjab relates to which of the following ?

In which one of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that confession of co-accused are very weak evidence and no conviction can be based solely on such confession ?

Which of the following case is not related to the confession ?

Confession can be result of self-talk, communication of confession to another person is not necessary, was held in the case of

During the course of investigation information received from an accused who is in police custody leads to the discovery about arms,cloths, ornament, corpus which are related with the offence are relevant under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. This principle is laid down in the case law of :

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that "any information or material that is sub-sequently discovered with the help of voluntarily administered test result can be admitted, in accordance with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act ,1972"?

In which one of the following cases was the constitutional validity of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act was upheld?

In which one of the following cases, constitutional validity of section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act was challenged on the basis of being violative of Article 20 (3) of the Indian Constitution ?

"A confession even consists of conversation to oneself, for it is not necessary for the relevancy of a confession that it should be communicated to some other person",was held in the case of -

In which case section 27 of Indian Evidence Act was held to be valid under Article -14 of Constitution of India ?

Which one of the following is a leading case on confession to persons in authority ?

Which of the following is a leading case on confession :

State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyay is concerned with

"Knowledge of STD booth from where accused persons talked with each other, is relevant for Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872." It was laid down by the Supreme Court in

State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde relates to

Which of the following cases is not related to confession?

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that, a confession must either admit in terms of the offence or at any rate, substantialy, all the facts which constitute the offence?