Welcome to your C 4 - FR 4 - Equality
'Carry forward' rule was held to be 'ultra vires' in the case of -
After which one of the following Supreme Court decisions was the special provision for socially and educationally backward classes, introduced by an Amendment of the Constitution of India ?
It has been said in many cases, viz, Devdasan v. UOI that Article 16 should be read with -
In which of the following case the Supreme Court held that Article 16(4-A) providing for reservation in promotions is a enabling provisions ?
Rajeev Kumar Gupta v. Union of India (2016) deals with the reservations in State services for
Which of the following cases is popularly known as "the Mandal case "?
In which case the Supreme Court has held that the maximum limit of reservation cannot exceed 50 percents
The Supreme Court of India has adopted new approach for the interpretation of the concept 'Equality' in :-
Supreme Court decision in Srilekha Vidyarthi v. State of Uttar Pradesh is based on :-
The new concept of equality as an antithesis of arbitriness was propounded first by the Supreme Court in which of the following cases ?
It has been held by the Supreme Court that appointment of the candidates in excess of the notified vacancies is a denial and deprivation of the fundamental rights under article 14 read with article 16 (1) of the Constitution in :-
In which one of the following cases the Supreme Court has declared Article 15 (5) as Constitutional ?
In which recent case the Supreme Court held that the Transgenders fall in the Category of Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBs) .
After which one of the following Supreme Court decisions was the special provision for socially and educationally backward classes, introduced by an Amendment of the Constitution of India ?
In Indra Sawhney v. Union of India case, the Supreme Court has held that there :-
Under one of the following judgments the Supreme Court directed the Government to constitute a permanent body in favour of the backward classes :-
In which case did the Supreme Court observe "Equality of opportunity admits discrimination with reason and prohibits discrimination without reason "?
